Hello, hello

It's been awhile since I've updated my blog -- my current schedule being what it is it just hasn't been possible to do daily posts like I've done, once upon a time. I could make time, it's true -- I can always make time -- but as is the case with everything else, it comes down to priority lists and cost-benefit analyses and at the end of the day, nothing gets written (that's appropriate for posting here, anyway).

That being said though, I do think that it's still good practice for me to write regularly. Tumblr is well and good because it's more informal and there is VERY little low pressure to generate unique content when all I can do is hit "reblog", but it'll be good for me to write something more structured that is NOT related to what I have to do at work, because I have a very (justified) fear that I may forget how to write something that's not a science report.

Still, I'm a bit short on time still, and given that this IS my blog, I've made the executive decision that I'll write one post a week, regardless of the length, and if I'm really short on time I'll just ...not revise / edit it. Editing takes about 2-3x as long for me than writing these stream-of-thought posts, you see. You have been warned: you will get to see my informal writing in all of its grammatically questionable glory and if that's not your thing...well I assume since you are here, you know how to operate a browser.

No seriously, I feel that my academic writing is slowly destroying my ability to write anything else. One of my acquaintances had said that writing an article and writing a short story shouldn't be all that different (she...doesn't write stories) since they're both narratives that need clear writing with beginning and end and  you are essentially telling a story in both cases. Having thought about it, I concluded that yes, there are similarities, but for me, who has written both, the differences are more obvious than the similarities. It's like the different between Monet and Mondrian -- they are both painters and paintings are very similar as an medium of art in that you do need technical skills to apply pigment to a surface in order to convey certain kinds of thought and emotion in the viewer. However, if you will google image Claude Monet and Piet Mondrian, I think you will agree with me that the style is VERY different, the technique to paint each other is most likely different, and the general feelings of looking at a Monet, regarding which one, is very different from what you get from a Mondrian.

Scientific writing is, for me, the Mondrian; fiction writing is the Monet.